Blog

Speech-to-speech AI, a primer

What changed in 2024, what the words mean, and why a new class of models treats speech as a first-class language rather than a pipeline of text conversions.

Articles

Follow voice AI with Signals.

One weekly email with new models, benchmarks, datasets, and research.

What brings you here?

Select at least one interest. Required.

Confirm your email to start your subscription. Unsubscribe anytime.

References
  1. 01Speech-to-speech AI, a primerWhat changed in 2024, what the words mean, and why a new class of models treats speech as a first-class language rather than a pipeline of text conversions.published
  2. 02The full-duplex thresholdA number, a biology fact, and a small cluster of systems. What the full-duplex threshold actually is, what it takes to cross it, and what conversations above it unlock.published
  3. 03From pipeline to integrated“Integrated” sounds like one architecture. It is at least four. A field guide to the 2026 full-duplex STS landscape — four families under one label, their latency math, their data bets, and their license exposure.published
  4. 04The data ceilingFull-duplex conversational recordings at internet scale do not exist. The two escape hatches engineers reach for first — better separation AI and bigger YouTube scrapes — do not escape. Full-duplex STS still leans on a 2004 telephone corpus for its post-training recipe.published
  5. 05Foundation before verticalFull-duplex STS sits between the GPT-2 and GPT-3 moments. Asking “which vertical wins first?” in 2026 is a category error — the constraint is whether the foundation the verticals will sit on exists yet. A thesis essay on the foundation threshold, the 30×–150× data gap, and six plausible routes to 100,000+ hours of two-channel dialogue.published
  6. 06Mapping the benchmark landscapeToo many speech-to-speech benchmarks, each covering a different slice. The map, as of April 2026 — arena versus fixed test set, four capability axes, a coverage heatmap, and a Japanese gap.published
  7. 07Why STS needs new benchmarksThe STS field inherited evaluation machinery from ASR, TTS, and text-LLM paradigms. None of them measured a live, two-channel, socially-timed conversation. The argument for a rebuild, plus a concrete picture of who could run it.published
  8. 08The STS model landscapeThirty-plus speech-to-speech models, four architectural families, and a licensing pattern that is starting to split inside each lab. A field guide to the April 2026 map, legible enough to place newly announced models in one or two paragraphs.published
  9. 09Consent, licensing & the opt-in economyThe consent and licensing stack for conversational voice data in April 2026 is three layers deep: a fixed biometric-privacy floor, a seven-platform patchwork middle, and a transparency ceiling partially in force and partially in draft. An opt-in voice-data economy requires all three to survive together.published
  10. 10What comes after STSThe open questions the first nine dispatches leave behind — multimodal, on-device, and the next evaluation moat.Q3 2026soon